lauraj
- Total activity 26
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 0
- Subscriptions 10
Activity overview
Latest activity by lauraj-
lauraj created a post,
Support for code contracts?
One of our engineers is considering adopting the use of code contracts in .NET 4.0. As I understand it, that will add new tags to the .XML file with info about the requirements of the member (param...
-
lauraj commented,
OK, I solved it by text-editing the .dxp file. Seems a little kludgey, but it works. I just moved the lines identifying the assemblies (near the end of the .dxp) around so they were in the right o...
-
lauraj commented,
Wow, no answer since 2008? This seems like such a basic thing to want to do. Any updates? I am currently thinking I'll have to remove all my assemblies (which will remove their content files), re-...
-
lauraj created a post,
Changing syntax language for a type library
I'm documenting an ActiveX component, and Document!X seems determined to show syntax only in Visual Basic. We expect our customers to use VB.NET or C#. To begin with the ActiveX templates don't inc...
-
lauraj created a post,
Plans for Windows 7?
Has anyone heard of plans for Document!X to support Windows 7? Our team wants to move the development environment to Win7 and VS2010 ASAP.
-
lauraj commented,
w00t!
-
lauraj created a post,
Will Document!X support Help 3.0?
If so, when? (If not, why not?) Thanks!
-
lauraj commented,
I've seen this too. We've sequenced our nightly build to do the doc build before the obfuscation step to avoid the problem.
-
lauraj commented,
I didn't find any alternative; I ended up implementing the "master intro" which is currently rather redundant of the intro to my main assembly. Sigh. Betsy, do please post if you find a workaround.
-
lauraj commented,
I think this answer is ridiculous. I've got a similar situation, but mine is a mature project to which I've just added a second .NET assembly. The second assembly is genuinely secondary, and I'd li...